IELTS Writing Samples by topic

8.5

band

Some people say arts such as music and painting cannot directly improve the quality of people's life, so the government should not put money on art such as music and painting, instead, they should spend more money on construction of public services. D

People have different opinions about whether the authority should allocate money to art sections, such as music and painting. Some of them insist that governments should put more money into public services as the arts have no direct contribution to people

5.5

band

People believe that arts like painting and music does not directly improve the quality of life, and therefore they think government’s money should be spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that the improvement of people’s living standard is not directly related to arts, such as paintings and music, thus it is more reasonable if government’s fundings are used in other urgent areas. While fields like education, medical care and infrastructure play an important role in people’s life, I do believe that spending money on arts will also bring benefits to people.

band

People believe that arts like painting and music does not directly improve the quality of life, and therefore they think government’s money should be spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the contemporary era,there is a heated argument over the issue that a living standard does not depend upon the arts and organisations have to invest their funds into another field which leads to improving the status of their citizens. A lion's share society favours it ,however the rest go averse to it. The following paragraphs would highlight my personal perspective along with an apt example.

band

People believe that arts like painting and music does not directly improve the quality of life, and therefore they think government’s money should be spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

İt is consider by some people that arts like painting and music does not directly improve the quality of life, and therefore they think government’s money should be spent on other things. I completely disagree with the opinion , and think arts affect societies in a nice way in the world . Arts can touch to many children life or they can finish wars and poorness .

5.5

band

Some people think that arts (such as painting and music) do not directly improve the quality of people's life, so governments should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

Whilst the continuous development in the arts and literature over the aeons, some individuals condemn the huge sum being spent in this field. As, arguably, it does not seem to have any profound impact on improving the quality of human life. However, it a

band

Some people think that arts (such as painting and music) does not directly improve the quality of people's life, so governments should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

In our modern society, the development of economy and civilization cannot lack the contribution of arts because it brings a multitude of advantages to serve everyone. Some people believe that the government should invest money in other zones but from my point of view, the arts play an important in helping to develop the economy and civilization.

band

Some people think that arts (such as painting and music) do not directly improve the quality of people's life, so governments should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

Throughout history, arts had played an essential part in our spiritual life before transforming into a lucrative industry. In contrast, several opinions argue that because living quality can not be directly affected by arts, it is better for politicians to navigate finance's current into other fields. Although this principle will bring immediate benefits in particular situations, I partly disagree with it on account of the considerable profits provided by artistic manufacturers in the modern age.

band

Some people think that arts (such as painting and music) does not directly improve the quality of people's life, so governments should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

In our modern society, the development of the economy and culture cannot lack contribution to the arts because it brings a multitude of advantages to serve everyone. Some people believe that the government should earn money in other zones but from my point of view, arts which completely help develop the economy and culture.

7.5

band

Some people think that the arts (such as painting and music) do not directly improve quality of people's life, so government should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people insist that as the quality of people's lives is not necessarily enhanced by the arts (such as music and painting), the government needs to find another area for investment. In my view, I firmly disagree because art has actually contributed to

band

Some people believe arts such as painting and music cannot directly improve quality of peoples life, so that governments money should be spent on other things. How far do you agree or disagree?

Some section of public feel that quality of life is not enhanced when the government invests funds on arts like painting and music instead it should be spent on other entities. I agree to this statement to a greater extent with adequate supportive reasons

Become Premium

Check as many essays as you want
Analyze highlighted mistakes
Use the built-in grammar checker
Discover your weaknesses
Get suggestions to get a higher score
Browse the history of checked essays
14-day money back guarantee