The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries. Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries. Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three charts illustrate the methods of solving dangerous
waste
products in terms of three countries namely the Republic of
Korea
,
Sweden
, and the United
Kingdom
. Looking from an
overall
perspective, it is readily apparent that
while
recycling is the main way to solve dangerous
waste
products in
Korea
,
Sweden
and the United
Kingdom
prefer to dig
this
rubbish underground.
Moreover
, there are far more ways to deal with dangerous
waste
in the United
Kingdom
compared to other nations. A deep analysis of the charts provided reveals that 69% of the amount of
waste
was recycled in
Korea
, making up the largest proportion of recycling methods among the three countries compared to the percentage of 25% in
Sweden
. It can be seen that there was about 22% of
this
dangerous trash was dug in the land,
whereas
only 9% of that was burned by fire in
Korea
. Looking at the charts in more detail, in the United
Kingdom
, solving
waste
products by digging was considered to be the most popular way (82%), which is more than 27% of that in
Sweden
(55%). There was only a total of 2% in the proportion of incineration in the UK,
while
the data was 10 times higher than that in
Sweden
, with 20%. It is
also
notable that in the United
Kingdom
, chemical treatment and dumping at sea made up exactly the same proportion of rubbish dealings, at exactly 8%.
Submitted by yeshomeclass on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Linking words: Don't use the same linking words: "while".
Conclusion: The conclusion is too long.
Vocabulary: Replace the words waste, korea, sweden, kingdom with synonyms.
Vocabulary: The word "charts" was used 3 times.
Vocabulary: The word "compared" was used 2 times.
Vocabulary: The word "proportion" was used 3 times.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: