Some feel that movies and tv shows are a good way to study history despite their lack of historical accuracy at times. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that

TV

programs are a great source to attain education about history. In spite of they don’t provide accurate information. From my perspective, I partially agree with

this

viewpoint and will elaborate on some reasons to justify

this

stance.

To begin

with, movies and

TV

shows are useful tools to learn about history, even if they are not always completely accurate. The population are keen to attain historical philosophy.

Therefore

, after watching historical dramas masses become curious about exploring that particular era. They are eager to know about their culture, challenges and achievements.

For example

, the drama series Magnificent Century and Dirilis Ertugrul are most popular around the world not only

in particular

countries. Because these shows beautifully portray the whole story of the Ottoman Empire.

Whereas

,

people

don’t get true knowledge by watching drama series. There are ample facts and figures that are missing which creates misunderstanding about the past times.

Furthermore

, Writers omit some information if they don’t share it with

people

so it is essential for

people

to supplement their understanding with rigorous and reliable sources

such

as scholarly articles and historical textbooks by authentic authors.

For instance

, some movies and

TV

shows may exaggerate and alter historical facts to fit into a particular narrative.

As a result

, they can create misconceptions about historical events.

To sum up

,

although

tv

shows open the window to knowing about the past times.

people

should acknowledge that

this

is not a definitive source for the acquisition of knowledge about history.