50 Latest Structure IELTS Topics

Get a band score and detailed report instantly. Check your IELTS essays right now!
Some believe that traffic problems in cities can best be resolved by investing in urban infrastructure while others feel there are superior solutions. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
A government’s role is only to provide defense capability and urban infrastructure (roads, water supplies, etc.). All other services (education, health, social security) should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people believe that governments should spend money on the arts. Others assert that this money should be used to improve public services and infrastructure. Discuss both sides and give your opinion
Some countries focus on health care and education benefits while others on infrastructure and employment. Which do you think would be more beneficial for the population? Give specific details and examples to support your opinion.
A poor infrastructure hinders under developed countries from progressing and modernizing. Some people think this should be the first problem tackled by foreign aid. To what extent do you agree?
Write about the following topic: A government’s role is only to provide defense capability and urban infrastructure (roads, water supplies, etc.). All other services (education, health, social security) should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
TOPIC: In recent years, the family structure and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive and negative?
Rishabh Varma Rishabh Varma, A Number's Person / Newbie @ Data Science Answered Jan 23, 2017 · Author has 124 answers and 290k answer views There are 2 Types of IELTS students who are concerned with the Examination process: One who really struggles with the day-to-day usage of English. One who wants to score Higher Bands for their very benefits in Work permits and college admissions. Writing: I cannot give much detail on how to prepare for the Writing part (I scored 7 Myself). Letter writing (General Module) or the Data Analysis (Academic module) carries less weightage, so concentrate more on the Essay Writing part. All I can say is that stick to the basic structure of Essay writing. Para 1: Reinstate the topic and take your stand on it. For the rest of the Essay, you can either say FOR the topic or AGAINST the topic. This part is important as you should have enough Data to speak for in the remaining essay. Para 2-3-4: Take 1 example in each Para and give details explanation of the same. Para 5: Mention the counter side of the argument I.e If you have been saying FOR the topic up till now, give 1 example of AGAINST part. But make sure that you indirectly take your discussion to what you have been saying up till now. (Example: You have said that eating Tomatoes is good for health. NOW in the 5th Para you need to discuss one drawback of the consumption of tomatoes, but sway the discussion towards how the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.) This will give strong signal to the examiner that you are completely aware of what you are talking about and that you are Afraid to take the Counter Examples. Para 6: Just summarize the entire discussion and give concluding sentence. DON'T add new details in the conclusion Para. It's a Red Cross. GRAMMER: You need to polish your grammer skills. It need not be at a high level though. You should provide a fer Complex Structured sentences every now and then. One such complex structure should consist: Verbs Nouns-Pronouns Subject-verb agreement Modifiers Idioms Parallelism Tenses SAMPLE ESSAY: Do look at the sample essays but do not panic looking at the language. Try and structure the sample in your own way. Those samples are 8.5 Bands and Indians usually get the least in the Writing Section. Speaking: If you are planning to take Classes for improving your communication skills, Please don't. Fluency comes from Practice. You need to work with the English language at least 3 months prior to your Exam date, if you are really struggling with the language. I will try and provide tips as I discuss the Different stages of this section. Section 1: This is an intro section. The interviewer will ask you about yourself and few details of things that matter to you or are related to your life. You will find tons of sample question for this section in the Internet. Topics range from: Hobby to Family to Education to Job to Flowers. You need to speak on any given topic whether related to you or not. Section 2: Cue Card. Again sample available. Make sure that you speak for at least 90 sec. Also you need to keep in mind that the Third Section is somehow related to what you say in this section. So do not exaggerate on things that you will find hard to explain in Third Section. Important thing here is speak for the complete length and make sense at the same time. PRACTICE: It won't take more than 30 mins per day to practice a range of topics. So make sure that you practice enough questions to be Exam Ready. I practiced a lot but on the exam day got topics that were completely different. The key for me way the fluency that I was able to achieve during practice and even though I was short of Ideas on the D-Day, it went well for me. There is no Written rule as to what you need to get 7 as the Interviewer is different and questions are random. Just practice and gain enough info on different topics and you will surely ace the Examination. I hope I was of some help. I hate diplomatic answers myself, but cannot help you here with anything else. Best of Luck!
Some people believe that governments should prioritize spending on public services like education, healthcare, and the environment, while others believe that money should be spent on building infrastructure, such as roads and bridges. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
In the era of 21st-century technology has become part and parcel of every flesh and bloods life. Upgrading to the existing technology involves huge substantial cost. In developed countries like the USA , Canada etc government try spending on new and faster means of transport like by constructing new railways etc. whereas in developing countries like India, Pakistan etc government should spend on improving the existing transport. By constructing new lines for the railway will have different benefits such as tourism will increase and people get more employed because government would be spending on development of infrastructure. Over and above the states and zones would be linked, people can travel long distance for work in less time. With new technology, there would be faster development as a country will be moving along the same lines as the technology. It would also increase the GDP of the country as employment would increase so will the output of the country will increase. But by spending huge sums of money developing country will increase their own debt and would thus putting themselves in hot water. Developing country's existing transport will continue to depreciate as no money is spend on them as the money is diverted towards the construction and maintenance of the new railway. The cost of the new railway will increase and focus on small repair works on existing transport will diminish. If the money is used for the repair works on the existing machines then country could save some money which could be used in other constructive works and this will lead to fuller utilization of the existing transport. So according to me, developing countries must spend their money on developing their existing transport because most of them are already in huge debts from the international bank and this would lead to small saving for the government, which could be utilized in repaying debts or other important activities
In recent  years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occuring?Do you think these changes are positive or negative?Give reasons for your enswer and include relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Some people believe that traffic problems in cities can best be resolved by investing in urban infrastructure while others feel they are superior solutions discuss both sides and keep on opinion.
Governments should focus on building transportation infrastructure for bicycles rather than motor vehicles. To what extent do you agree?
Chinwa: Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor. What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped? All nations have economically deprived persons, as well a various means with which they are dealt with. This essay will discuss some causative factors of global impoverishment, in terms of corruption and conflict, as well suggest means these individuals could be assisted. One of the major cause of poverty is corruption. This is because, resources proposed for economic development through building of infrastructures as well as industries, which will create jobs and better living conditions of citizens are embezzled, thus resulting in impoverishment. For instance, according to report from economic journal 55% of Nigeria citizens are impoverished which is due to high level corruption. In addition to this, conflict is another causative factor of economic deprivation. This is owing to the fact that lives, amenities, structures as well as businesses are destroyed in the advent of crisis. More so, people are constantly on the run, seeking asylum in neighbouring countries abandoning their properties. On the other hand, impoverished people could be assisted by the government in several ways. Firstly, leaders should channel more funds in the establishment of small and medium scale businesses for these individuals, as well as beefing up security in crisis prone areas, which would ensure safety properties and consequently improve their living condition. Secondly, strict policies and penalties ought to be implemented by the authorities on individual guilty of embezzling funds meant for economic growth. This however, will deter individuals from such act, therefore enhancing the financial growth of the people. For example, Japan is considered the country with the the least number of destitute, which is attributed to their zero tolerance to corruption. In conclusion, poverty is a major problem caused by series of factors, however, measures such as implementing regulations against corrupt actions, as well setting business ventures is means of assisting impoverished individuals
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic. When you restructure your premises, the most significant aspect is considering internal benefit than external looks when designing a building, the most important factors is intended use of the building rather than it’s outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern world, families have become more independent and the part people play at home also has changed significantly. I believe this is a positive trend in terms of the quality of life. Households are increasingly becoming less rigid as people become more independent. As the society develops, a growing number of people, especially young people who value privacy and space, have chosen to live apart from their parents and have an independent life. This allows them to make their own decisions in most cases without the interference from their parents. Meanwhile, women enjoy equality in many parts of the world today, so many of them have decided to enter the job market like their husbands to have a fulfilling career, instead of staying at home. This change in the family structure not only liberates women from their traditional gender based role but also benefits men, because when the family has more earnings, the financial burden on husbands is lessened. I believe this is a good thing as an independent dual-income household can help people enjoy a high-quality life. When people live their own lives, it considerably reduces the family tension that often happens in an extended family. Staying away from those conflicts and arguments caused by generation gap, young people and their parents can both feel happy. What is more, as the wife also earns salaries, a family has more income sources. When people have disposable income, they will be able to spend on what they like or want. For example, they can have an exotic holiday or buy a luxury car. They are less confined to a limited budget, and this contributes a lot to the improvement in their standards of living. In conclusion, families are changing significantly in terms of their structure and the role people play within its boundaries. This has a positive influence on households due to the fact it enables people to live a high-quality life. Do you have an essay on this topic? Submit it below in the comments for a free band score estimate.
Some think Government spending on Infrastructure (Transport, Housing etc) is considered the most important for a nation. While others believe that education, health and HR values to be more important areas for government expenditure. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A government’s role is only to provide defence capability and urban infrastructure (roads, water supplies, etc.). All other services (education, health, social security) should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community. Do you agree or disagree?
A government's role is only to provide defense capability and urban infrastructure, such as roads, water and power. All other services, such as education, health and social security, should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
or the moment, development is driven by the same absurd machismo typified by HS2, a belief that prosperity lies in centralism, bigness, disruption and public extravagance. Small and local is for wimps. Beauty is for herbivores. The so-called national infrastructure commission is not a regulator but a lobby for the “big eight” building contractors and their grand projects. As Scruton and Boys Smith point out, this approach to planning is deeply un-green. It favours the destruction of old buildings with tax reliefs and starter subsidies. It imposes 20% VAT on conserving the “embedded energy” of existing buildings, but subsidises the carbon release of new ones. In addition, identikit estates have densities so low as to require a car journey for every need. This is global warming “planned in” to the system. It is refreshing to read a Whitehall report that gets the message of America’s Ed Glaeser and others, that “green means urban”. Happiness lies not in anonymous sprawl but in the adaption and intensification of existing city buildings. New York has the lowest per-capita carbon footprint in the US. The report advocates the “gentle densification” of Britain’s underoccupied cities. West Yorkshire has 2,400 mills lying vacant, offering 52,000 new homes. Britain’s low property taxes effectively subsidise emptiness, which in London – with one of Europe’s lowest densities – conceals potential homes for “millions more households”.
The government should not waste money on arts as this money would be better spent on other projects like sanitation or infrastructure. Do you agree with the above statement?
Write about the following topic: A government’s role is only to provide defence capability and urban infrastructure (roads, water supplies, etc.). All other services (education, health, social security) should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
A government's role is only to provide defence capability and urban infrastructure, such as roads, water and power. All other services, such as education, health and social security, should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some think Government spending on infraestructure (transport, housing) is considered the most important for a nation. While others believe that education, health, and HR values to be more important areas for government expenditure. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In recent years, the family structure has changed as well as family roles, what are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative ? Give reason for your answer and include any relevant from your own knowledge or experience.
In the era of 21st century technology has become part and parcel of every flesh and bloods life. Upgrading to the existing technology involves huge substantial cost. In developed countries like USA , Canada etc, government try spending on new and faster means of transport like by constructing new railways etc. Whereas in developing countries like India, Pakistan etc, government should spend more on improving the existing transport. By constructing new lines for railway we will have different benefits such as tourism will increase and people get more employed because government would be spending on development of infrastructure. Over and above the states and zones would be linked, people can travel long distance for work in less time. With new technology there would be faster development as country will be moving along the same lines as the technology. It would also increase the GDP of the country as employment would increase, so will the output of the country will increase. But by spending huge sums of money developing country will increase their own debt and would thus put themselves in hot water. Developing countries existing transport will continue to depreciate as no money is spend on them. The money is diverted towards the construction and maintenance of the new railway. The cost of the new railway will increase and focus on small repair works on existing transport will diminish. If the money is used for the repair works on the existing machines then country could save some money which can be used in other constructive works and this will lead to fuller utilisation of the existing transport. So according to me developing countries must spend their money on developing their existing transport because most of them are already in huge debts from the international bank and this would lead to small saving for the government, which could be utilised in repaying debts or other important activities.
Taking a “gap year” off between high school and university has become a popular option among many young people. This time off provides a break after many years of formal study. Some students use this time to travel around the world, others volunteer and still others begin working. The idea behind each of these activities is to do something hands-on and refreshing, which enables young people to learn more about themselves and their place in the world around them. The benefits of taking a year off are plentiful. On a personal level, students who travel away from home develop their independence and self-confidence. On a cultural level, they learn about viewpoints, traditions and perspectives different from their own. Professionally, students get a taste of diverse workplaces, which might inspire a possible career interest. Intellectually, they examine their own beliefs and ideas in relation to those of others in a new environment. All these advantages combine to make a strong case for taking the one-year break. Nevertheless, there are also dangers involved in taking such a long break. Academically, the main drawback is that students can get sidetracked from their studies. A year is a long time and students could lose the good study habits and sense of discipline they had when they were in a formal academic structure. If they begin working, they could also be deluded into thinking that they’re making a lot of money. They could lose the benefit of college or university education and the chance to earn a higher income all their lives. In conclusion, whether to take a year-long break or not is an individual decision. Each young person should consider his or her motivations carefully and decide on what’s most desirable. Time is a precious resource and people of all ages, including young people, should treat it with respect
Some educators believe teachers should use materials that expose students to only those language structures they have already been taught. To what extent do you agree with this point of view?
A government's role is only to provide defence capability and urban infrastructure( such as roads and water supplies). All other services ( education, health, social security) should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There are a lot of old buildings in need of renovation in major cities which would be a massive undertaking with financial constraints. However, based on the opinion of some experts, it is better to divert those funds to build better infrastructure like housing and roads. Personally, I vote for the restoration of the buildings.
In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
Some believe that in many nations, it is necessary to spend a lot of money to build new railway infrastructure for fast trains between cities. Others feel that the government should spend money to improve existing public transportation. Discuss both of these perspectives and give your opinion.
The government should not waste money on arts as the same money would be better spent on p projects like sanitation or infrastructure. Do you agree to this statement
In recent years, the family structure and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of change have occurred? Do you think these changes are positive and negative?
FUNDING ART, MUSIC,AND FILIM IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN FUNDING PUBLIC STRUCTURE.AGREE OR DISAGREE
OPIC: In recent years, the family structure and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive and negative?
Increasingly, the pressure of work is forcing people to spend less and less time with their families. This situation is eroding the family structure, with dangerous consequences for society as a whole. In what ways is the pressure of modern day living damaging family unity and how can this problem be reduced?
In recent years, the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive and negative?
Become Premium
  • Check as many essays as you want
  • Analyze highlighted mistakes
  • Use the built-in grammar checker
  • Discover your weaknesses
  • Get suggestions to get a higher score
  • Browse the history of checked essays
  • 14-day money back guarantee