A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. What problems can this cause? How migth these problems be reduced?

Nowadays, improving the conditions of city life is more visible than in rural areas.

Although

it seems more valuable at the first glance, it brings some disadvantages with it. There are some ways to reduce

this

problem, but the government's role has the most effect on it to tackle these difficulties. The high-level standard situation in the Arbun area leads to emigrating more rustic residents to cities to have better lives. which leads to

further

problems like overcrowded society, air pollution and sound pollution. It caused us to construct more housing areas with more furnishings for them, and need more spaces for them to build so that we have fewer greenery zone compared with the more greenery fields. The other problem is we lose the gorgeous view of our villages by the lack of attention to them by governments and residents. There must be more local people to stay to make more facilities for their land and protect more for their natural around

instead

of moving to towns and destroying trees to make more wooden material for urban citizens.

Although

there are several approaches to solving these issues, the government has a significant role in it. It can encourage the rural community to stay in their area by providing some sort of opportunities like health centres, better educational departments, making attractive resting areas and so on. Having more advantages in the countryside to encourage the population to stay, brings equal rations of the population between these two inhabitants zones. In conclusion,

although

raising the standard of urban's life is irrefragable, developing more benefits in rural conditions to prevent the rustic population's migration to cities is one of the government's duties.