Some people argue that individuals’ freedom should be in accordance with laws and rules, otherwise, society cannot function as it should be. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that some individuals reckon that flexibility should be according to laws and

rules

, whereas society cannot function as it should . I agree with a larger extent to

this

notion . And I will discuss the reasons in upcoming paragraphs . To commence with , every masses have

its

Correct pronoun usage

their

show examples

own rule and regulations . But if their limits are not fixed

then

it can be harmful to the nation . So making laws and

rules

against

this

obstacle is a good way to tackle

this

problem . To explain it , some folks are using their immunity in the wrong ways like as , crime and drug supply.

Thus

, it is wrong to use their freedom .

Moreover

, sometimes all masses all not eligible for getting equal rights .

For instance

, in some ,regions some

third

-party people are leading very injustice behaviour .

Thus

, it is the best way to remove

this

kind of problem.

In addition

, if the law and

rules

are made

then

the crime rate is definitely decreased . As well as all the people easily get equal opportunities like good education

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and health facilities . So

this

is the antidote to exemption .

For example

, in some countries like America and ,Australia the crime matched is at its peak because the main reason

that is

responsible for

this

opportunity matched . All children have their own weapons .

Thus

, it reduces the matched of social feelings .

Although

, some societies are led to very unusual behaviour of the folks so authorities should make new

rules

and criteria to tackle

this

notion . To conclude , According to me it helps to increase nationality among the population and if the rule is fixed

then

all the masses like their power in only a good way