Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favor.

Nowadays, the

prohibition

of smoking in public

places

is a controversial topic. Some countries have established ban laws on smoking in public

places

, while others have no intention of doing it.

This

essay will discuss the debate and give a conclusion view. On the one hand, those who support the

forbiddance

Replace the word

forbidding

show examples

of smoking

tobacco

in public

places

promote the idea that smoking in these

places

encourages increasing

tobacco

consumption. It means that people will be encouraged to smoke.

For example

, youth and children are usually present in public sites like restaurants, so they will be curious about smoking and encouraged to try it.

Furthermore

, proponents of

prohibition

claim that smoking in public locations negatively affects social

health

and increases the number of patients.

In other words

, cigarette smoke spreads in general sites and will affect the

health

of the present population.

For instance

, employees of an office will get

health

problems because they spend a long time under the influence of

tobacco

smoke. To supporters of

this

Idea, the benefits of

this

law

are convincing.

On the other hand

, opponents of cigarette smoking

prohibition

can cite that

this

law

will cause recessions. The

law

might reduce the consumption of

tobacco

.

Consequently

,

tobacco

trading would be faced with a decrease;

for example

, the countries which earn money by exporting

tobacco

confront financial bankruptcy.

In addition

, critics

also

highlight the employees’ problems in their office because some of them become addicted to smoking cigarettes to increase their concentration during their work, so because of smoking

prohibition

, they might not be able to do their jobs well.

This

argument

also

appears to be quite powerful. In conclusion, I would tend to side with the proponents of establishing laws against smoking. It seems that

this

law

will promote public

health

.

Although

some say that national financial matters could be destroyed, healthy people will be able to solve

this

problem.