Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian rilef during natural disaster.Do you agree or disagree?

It is commonly debated whether
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
developed
countries
should provide monetary or provisionary
aid
to undeveloped
countries
in times of unforeseen natural catastrophe. While some folks advocate the opposite view, I would highly recommend that wealthy state and their population support the
areas
in dire need of help. To start with, the main reason for the humanitarian support provided on time will help the poorer nations continue their plan without delays. The capital and items provided within the
aid
will help the disaster-hit
areas
recover gradually, while the federal government moves forward with its development plans. As an illustration, the United States of America offered their full assistance when Pakistan was affected by the flood due to excessive rainfall. The
aid
was utilized to help the local population of the crisis-hit
areas
, and,
on the other hand
, Pakistan managed to complete their Dam development within the expected time frame.
As a result
, official tasks and plans were completed on time without any delay. The
second
reason for my perspective is that it is a moral, ethical and right decision to take for the
people
suffering in impoverished
areas
. Since the economically strong
countries
contain highly rich
people
, hosting charity events is the best way to alert these
people
of the devastation occurring in the poverty-stricken
countries
.
For example
, the Live
Aid
concert was held in America to make its citizen aware of the unhealthy condition and food crisis of South Africa. The concert helped raise millions of dollars through selling tickets and donations made by the
people
.
This
significantly controlled the community's spread of disease, and its member's health, and help counter the starvation crisis of African citizens. In conclusion, while it is not obligatory for the wealthy nations to lend a helping hand to the poor ones, I believe that the rich should consider helping the crisis hit nations to help them get back on their feet.
Submitted by www.nabeelmaqsood on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays: