Nuclear power is a necessary evil. Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fallout, nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non-renewable energy sources like oil and coal, which are quickly running out. In short, the benefits of nuclear far outweigh the risks of using it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

#power #consequences #fallout #energy #alternative #non-renewable #sources #oil #risks

Although

nuclear

energy

is considered dangerous,

nevertheless

, use of it is increasing day by day as non-renewable

resources

less in use

such

as crude oil and coal which are depleting with each passing day. I completely agree with

this

notion since it brings a lot of advantages as compared to its disadvantages which are going to be discussed in the following paragraphs. One of the major benefits is that the usage of nuclear power will curb the utilisation of non-renewable

resources

which take hundreds of years to produce;

however

, radio nuclear

energy

can be generated without the use of natural

sources

Thus

, it would be more convenient to adopt

such

sources

and could save the other

energy

sources

. Electricity,

for instance

, could be generated from nuclear

resources

This

may directly lead to less need for coal. If more nuclear

energy

will utilise , more natural

resources

could be saved for the future. Another benefit is that it is eco-friendly since it does not generate harmful greenhouse gases as other natural

sources

generate

such

as carbon dioxide and methane gases. Due to it, air pollution could be prevented and could curb the menace of its deleterious effect on ecology. As an illustration, while producing electricity, burning coal creates a lot of air pollution in form of smoke.

This

phenomenon results in harmful gases which reduce the air quality index.

Hence

this

new alternative

energy

will eliminate all these negative consequences on our surroundings. In conclusion, in spite of some bad effects of nuclear power, its advantages outnumbered its disadvantages

such

as its eco-friendly nature and saving natural

energy

sources

for upcoming generations.

Submitted by immysandhu94 on Sun Jul 24 2022

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Do you want to check your essays?

Submit an unlimited number of essays. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
3Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes

4 paragraphs

271 words

8.00

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0

Structure your answers in logical paragraphs

Include an introduction and conclusion

Support main points with an explanation and then an example

Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately

Vary your linking phrases using synonyms

Lexical resource: 7.0

Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms

Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes

Grammatical Range: 9.0

Use a variety of complex and simple sentences

Check your writing for errors

Task Achievement: 9.0

Answer all parts of the question

Present and fully explain ideas

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Word count

Become Premium

Check as many essays as you want
Analyze highlighted mistakes
Use the built-in grammar checker
Discover your weaknesses
Get suggestions to get a higher score
Browse the history of checked essays
14-day money back guarantee

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

6
band
should wealthy nations be rquired to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education ? or is it the responsibility of the goverment of poorer nations to look after thei citizens themselves.
The whole essence of humanity is basically not only to live and die but to ensure that meaningful impact is made in the lives of people. Some are of the opinion that goverments of poorer nations have the sole responsibility to cater for her own people. I strongly believe that wealthy nations should give helping hands to poorer societies.
5.5
band
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In life, if we just do the same thing and the same thing forever, absolutely we will get bored one day and that is why some people prefer changing their habits. Doing something new is the way that may get new interest of life. However, some people are just avoiding change and just keeping doing same things over. In my perspective, I would prefer changing my life everyday as I think that is a good way to have a new day.
5
band
Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery. However, some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities.
Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery. However, some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
7.5
band
should countries invest in building transport systems? discuss both views ans express an opinion
While some people may argue that an investment in transportation is a burden on the government, I am of the opinion that an putting funds into building transference mechanisms is a win-win situation. Both views will be discussed in this essay.
4.5
band
some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Some citizens consider recent buildings and constructions to be planed by the relevant authorities, especially for metropolises, howevre, others tend to belive that structuring and designing likely to be implemented by the owner of the projects. This essay will discuss both sides of view, namely how it is seen by some in terms of imortance of fundamental standarts such as being safe with reasnable pricing, on the other side, the opinions are with adding lovely features to view of the city, resulting in growth of tourism and economy sector.

should wealthy nations be rquired to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education ? or is it the responsibility of the goverment of poorer nations to look after thei citizens themselves.

Food can be produced much more cheaply today because of improved fertilizers and better machinery. However, some of the methods used to do this may be dangerous to human health and may have negative effects on local communities.

should countries invest in building transport systems? discuss both views ans express an opinion

some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. discuss both these views and give your opinion.