Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favor.

In many countries around the world, the legal prohibition against

tobacco

smoking has been enacted successfully.

However

, several other countries have not introduced the official restrictions as of today for multiple reasons, which will be discussed

further

in

this

essay. On the one hand, those who oppose the implementation of smoking restrictions in public

places

share the view that these measures can be non-effective in terms of reducing the frequency of

second

-hand

smoke

. In fact, they tend to highlight that the additional cost of building special “smoking areas” in public

places

is added, which has been the case in many instances.

Furthermore

, the critics of the smoking laws claim that banning indoor

tobacco

smoking can exacerbate the environmental pollution, as the smokers might continue to

smoke

outside of the public

places

, hospitals, or even educational institutes and pollute these areas with

smoke

and cigarettes butts.

In contrast

, the supporters of the smoking ban often point to the positive changes, of which the inhibitions could undermine the exposure to

second

-hand

smoke

. In

such

cases, the nonsmokers and the vulnerable group consisting of pregnant, young, or elderly who are unable to tolerate the hazardous exposure can substantially benefit from the

smoke

-free environment.

Moreover

, the critics of

tobacco

smoking

also

highlight

Correct subject-verb agreement

highlights

show examples

that these restrictions can

further

ameliorate public awareness about the negativity of

tobacco

smoking. If the government could pass definitive legislation against smoking in public spaces, it is believed that

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

this

would promote the unacceptability of smoking,

thus

encouraging more people to quit smoking. Overall, I would support the proponents of the smoking ban in public

places

. It seems reasonable to legally inhibit

tobacco

smoking in public spaces to mitigate the detrimental effects of

second

-hand

smoke

. The responsible entities should

further

enhance the execution of the legislation.