Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say we should concentrate more on problems of human beings. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Today's media highlights the major natural disaster issue, "Animal extinct". Some communities argue that countries and individuals should prevent

this

animal extinct symptom.

However

, many

crowd

Change to a plural noun

crowds

show examples

don't believe that support endangered

animals

. because they claim dying

animals

are caused by not only artificial

reasons

but

also

natural

reasons

. In

this

essay, I am going to illustrate both sides.

To begin

, people argue the idea of protecting wild

animals

for moral

reasons

. In early human civilization, people used to hunt

animals

to survive hunger and cold. But as centuries gose by, hunting

animals

became an unnecessary activity to maintain our lives.

However

, agreed for fame and selfishness couldn't stop a hunting activity.

For example

, an African elephant is in danger of extinct by vicious outlaw hunting from poachers. The wild elephant's fangs are so rare and expensive that people are willing to pay them even it is illegal. In fact, Not only African elephants, numerous

animals

got hunted for a temporary luxurious action.

Thus

unless hunting behaviour tackled morality, many associations attempt to protect

animals

for these

reasons

.

Therefore

, some animal experts assume that animal extinct occurs in a cycle of nature.

For example

, Cheeta is well known for being the most endangered animal in Africa.

Although

they are the top rank in a cycle of nature, their survival and birth rate is relatively low. ,

Also

Cheeta has a sensitive and introverted personality, that sometimes their poor mental condition interrupt mating and hunting activities. According to the research, cheeta cups' survival rates are only 20% in general.

In other words

, "Animal extinct" could occur without human effects. Not only natural causes, but the maintenance to protecting

animals

also

maintenance to protecting

animals

costs too high to control by independent individuals or communities. In sum, many folks have an argument over protecting endangered

animals

by countries and individuals. on the disagreement side, they argue that the symptom of dying

animals

cannot be controlled by human action, because it is a cycle of nature.

However

, I believe the responsibility of killing

animals

for selfishness, cannot be erased, In my opinion, to postpone an animal instinct, all endangered

animals

should have more protection and support in the communities and countries.