Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent in traveling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The traffic grid has been expanded to satisfy the increasing demand for public and individual transportation.
However
, the duration of getting to the workplace has been prolonged despite the fact that authority has made effort to manage the
city
routes in order to offer more convenient and effective solutions. In
this
case, one part of the public would advocate
this
municipal measurement,
on the contrary
, the other would show the opposite opinion. In my viewpoint, I would rather stand with those objectors. Admittedly, the main merit of maintaining the urban greening is to counteract the multiple pollutions during the process of industrialisation and modernisation,
moreover
, the parks and gardens, obviously, can ease the domestic and working pressure amid the population.
For example
, a central park has always equipped a social function which is gathering local dwellers around, meanwhile, it is able to lower the exhaust emitting and noise making from the traffic congestion. In short, it is rational to support
However
, .
Change the punctuation
,
.
show examples
A clear example is that the realistic phenomenon, the growing number of vehicles during the morning rush hours are appearing on the road, is urging the policymaker to implement an action to broaden the traffic lanes by sacrificing the public resources.
That is
to say, In conclusion, substituting the infrastructure, blindly, supposed to belong to the public well-being, in the name of solving the commuting problems, is not feasible for the development of a modern
city
.
Therefore
, I insist that the high proportion of urban landscaping is one of the core expectations in the perspective of a dweller who lives in the
city
. In the future,
city
planning and end-to-end commuting solutions, definitely, can reach a balance in order to diminish the argument.
Submitted by Welkin on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays: