Some argue that we should use cleaner energy sources to protect the environment, even though they are more expensive than traditional energy sources like coal and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

While most countries around the
world
nowadays chose coal and oil as main sources of
energy
, some
people
claimed that we should use green
energy
in order to alleviate the environmental problems. The following paragraphs will explain why I strongly support the suggestion to draw upon cleaner
energy
.
First
and foremost, as human beings, it is our responsibility to protect the natural
world
by any possible means including give up some conventional ways of obtaining
energy
. Since all sorts of current human activities take place on Earth, undoubtfully, the abuse of fossil fuel has become the culprit of series of environmental issues.
For example
, when fossil fuels are burnt in a car engine, a large amount of CO2, along with other greenhouse gases---especially these are not biodegradable---is eliminated into the atmosphere, which is responsible for some severe environmental issues
such
as air
pollution
and global warming. Noticing
such
harsh weather are proofed to have a long-lasting impact.
Therefore
, in order to build a cleaner
world
, we must replace
such
harmful fuels.
On the other hand
, consider the monetary matters, the opponent of the above statement says that
instead
of exploiting an alternative source of
energy
, it is better to spend money elsewhere
such
as growing trees, or develop sewage treatment which is proofed to be helpful in terms of cleaning.
Nevertheless
, the problem won’t be solved yet, unless we remove the sources of
pollution
.
Consequently
,
people
still have to spend extra fortunes on handling
such
contamination. What’s more,
such
things are out of concern if we simply use cleaner
energy
, namely, they produce no pollutants in the aftermath. In a word, rather than find ways to deal with the pollutants after burning fossil fuels,
people
should pay more attention to thoroughly eliminate the source of
pollution
. To conclude, I take a side on the suggestion that
people
should try alternative sources of
energy
not merely because of the importance of the natural
world
to humans but
also
a long-term approach to eliminate
pollution
.
Submitted by pengist on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: