Studying business or science related subjects at university level is more important than arts related courses like literature. Do you agree or disagree?

When considering tertiary level discipline, there is a school of thought that believes that studying concrete topics
such
as commerce, physics or biology is more valuable to the community than spending time focused on novels and other literary subjects.
However
,
this
argument is flawed for a number of reasons as will now be presented. Primarily, any form of study has inherent advantages.
Although
certain fields of study lead more directly into a position of employment, a university training is worthwhile not only for the schooling learned but
also
as an indication that the person has the ability to learn, and as
such
it is irrelevant whether it is a career based course of study or something more intangible, like the arts. It suggests to potential employers that the person can learn new skills, and
this
is often as important as what is already known.
Moreover
, those that complete an arts-related degree could potentially go on to be writers, poets or playwrights,
for example
, and
thus
contribute to the public in a cultural form rather than financially or technologically. The opinion that the writer is of less worth than the scientist is very biased, especially when it relates to a societal contribution. Admittedly, there is the point that science and business-related training can financially benefit a country, whereas art and literature are unlikely to offer the same value economically.
However
, a country’s wealth is not calculated in financial terms alone, and should
also
include more socially beneficial aspects. In sum,
therefore
, both types of discipline offer advantages to the country, so neither should have preference over the other as both have a degree of value to the community. If the more literary subjects are abandoned,
this
could result in a less creative community.
Submitted by srvtkml89 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays: