Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favour.

In

this

decade, some countries ensure smoking

have

Suggestion

has

a dread impact on

people

Suggestion

peoples'

peoples

health and they enact laws against smoking in public places like office and restaurant.

Other

Suggestion

Others

do not take part in

this

matter. We will argue both

side

Suggestion

sides

of

discussion

Suggestion

the discussion

in

this

essay. On the one hand, some studies

have shown

Suggestion

show

people every year die because of use tobacco

product

routinely and smoking

also

known as a slow killer and bring some disease like lung cancer.

it

Suggestion

It

should be imposing law against smoking to prevent

massive use

Suggestion

the massive use

of them.

Smoke

Suggestion

The smoke

itself contains a thousand of hazardous substances and when somebody smokes in overcrowded places like restaurant people who nearby effected and inhale the gas and

finally

get sick. Smoke Could cause a vast majority of diseases among children and infants and pregnant women. In

this

case, the government should try to avoid smoking in public places we should punish people who disobey

this

rule.

On the other hand

, there have been a lot of companies produce

this

product

and have a lot of

employee

Suggestion

employees

and reduce them has certain effect

in

Suggestion

on

economic system

Suggestion

the economic system

economic systems

. Smoking products have been already higher tax to prevent people to purchase

this

product

and aim of

this

kind of law it is only for gain profit rather than citizen’s health. People are

matured

Suggestion

maturing

, everybody

know

Suggestion

knows

about good and bad and everybody has a right to make your own decision. They should not set strict action against

smoker it

Accept comma addition

smoker, it

is not practical. In conclusion, I would tend to side with proponents of imposing law against smoking because there are

vast majority

Suggestion

a vast majority

of

consequences

Suggestion

the consequences

for

Suggestion

of

overuse

this

product

and people who close to

smoker

Suggestion

the smoker

a smoker

and government will face with

this

issue and it is Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings

such

as

offices

Suggestion

Offices

and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing

this

. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of

this

debate, and reach your own conclusion

on

Suggestion

On

which side you favour.