when a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. it is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion ?

Technology changed the features of everything around us,

however

, our original treats linger. While a country enhances its technological development, the conventional skills and styles of living vanish.

Moreover

, it does not make any sense to hold onto them. The Essay will argue why

this

is completely preposterous.

Although

it's really hard to keep the traditional habits and ways of life alive when a nation develops its technology, it's always worth it.

Furthermore

, it is those original

characterestics

a prominent attribute or aspect of something

characteristics

characteristic

that distinguish a human race from another.

For instance

, in Japan, despite the major scientific achievements, they still believe in the simple spiritual superstitions of their ancestors.

Therefore

, preserving the ancient authentic style of life does not contradict with the ability of

development

Suggestion

developing

.

On the contrary

, some people think that it's useless to hold on to the ancient way in which people used to live while dealing with modern technology. Indeed, that would be not only difficult, but

also

pointless.

For example

, in China,

old

Suggestion

oldest

museums are replaced with modern scientific galleries.

Consequently

, it's

not always feasible not

Suggestion

not always feasible

to give up on the traditional form of life while adapting to the current technological evolution. In conclusion, it's illogical for a nation to endeavour not to let go of our authentic skills and conventional lifestyle when it works on its technology. The Essay argued why

this

is extremely inaccurate. In my opinion, there is no contradiction between

such

goals and it's totally acceptable to stick to what our ancestors passed to us through different generations and

also

cope with the modern world.