Some people work for the same organisation al their working life. Other think that it is better to work for different companies. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

The public seem to be in the real dilemma which the labour force

are

Suggestion

is

mandatory to spend their career lives under only

one

employer

instead

of moving different companies. More employers will help the staff to brush up endeavour and diversity the networking, whereas the same company might promote the staff during their work periods. In order to arrive at

last

but not the least consensus, I will suggest them as

following

Suggestion

follows

initially

.

First

and foremost, according to

skepticals

, the same

organisation

gets the workforce to promote compared to the different organisations.

Nevertheless

, they should waste whole career lives for the board without any self- development by overworking and lessening family time.

For instance

, my dad who stayed at

one

university for 30 years is the paradigm

,

Accept space

,

because he

overtaught without

Accept comma addition

overnight, without

overnight without

overweight without

any salaries and get promoted before he was retired. If he had moved into another university, he would have gained his academic title at least. On the

one

hand, moving into different employment will surely bring

one

of the crucial

merit including

Accept comma addition

merit, including

an enormous amount of repertoire with

reft

an abstract idea of that which is due to a person or governmental body by law or tradition or nature

right

reef

refit

and hard skills, in light of gaining professional knowledge from different groups and mingling experienced experts. To say, after my alma-

mateur

Suggestion

mater

matter

,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

was hired by

one

of the state-owned

organisation

as a translator. Abruptly,

one

of the private entrepreneurs offered me to translate a guideline as a freelancer. Having accepted it, I realized that the same

organisation

never augmented any hard and soft skill.

On the other hand

, the networking could be extended after belonging to more than

one

organisation

. The reason why I argue is that any

spheres particularly

Accept comma addition

spheres, particularly

medical, education and IT require not only counterparts but

also

amateurs for exchanging expertise and achieving what we need to overcome. To prove myself as an example, after 3different employers, I decided to run my own business. At that time, a variety of networking died help me to manage the documentation at break neck. By way of conclusion,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

would re-affirm that only

one

employer never turns a new leaf on hard and soft skills which play a part and parcel role in the workforce seeing that shifting into more than same

organisation

never turns a blind eye into self-development and weak or strong ties.