Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Gretha
Thunberg's campaign in favour of environment
protection has promoted the idea that each person can contribute to Suggestion
environmental
this
effort. The fact that the ecological crisis is a global issue raises the question of the limits of individual decisions. Can individuals do anything for the environment ?
Accept space
?
This
essay will argue that even though larger organizations represent the most relevant scale, individuals have to take their part into
the fight Suggestion
in
agaisnt
global warming.
in contact with
against
First
of all, large companies and governments are the most relevant scale to save the planet. The former can change their way of production into a cleaner one whereas
the latter can regulate. On the one hand, states have a major role to play because of their Accept comma addition
one, whereas
coercion
power. Suggestion
coercive
In addition
, smaller scales of political power must be involved
Accept comma addition
involved, such
such
as municipality
. Suggestion
as a municipality
as municipal
as municipal municipal
For example
, Paris has decided to start forbiding
the most polluting cars. excluded from use or mention
forbidden
forbidding
On the other hand
, companies which pollutes can decide to stop producting
goods that hurt the planet. bring forth or yield
producing
For instance
, Airbus tries to design new planes that needs
less polluting components.
Suggestion
need
Nonetheless
, individuals are also
able to make a small difference. In effect, it would be too easy to put on structures the whole responsibility for climate change. Deciding to use less water or taking the train instead
of the plane should be considered as very effective ways of improving the environment. Producing certain meats such
as beef requires much water and plants to make animal grow
. As a consequence, reducing one's consumption could be useful to protect our to utter or emit low dull rumbling sounds
growl
ressources
.
To conclude, I would say that both structures and individuals have to feel concerned about climate change. The democratic system permits us to force these structures changing their point of view. available source of wealth; a new or reserve supply that can be drawn upon when needed
resources
Finally
, individuals have to understand that they are part of the structures
they criticize and that they have the power.Suggestion
structure
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?