Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

It is argued that that the people can not affect positively on their

habitat

, but

also

either public administrators or big enterprises alone can perform it. I disagree that administrators and firm alone can effect improvement to the

territory

because the people are closer to their home as well as have the

time

to execute a project that can boost the surroundings. To start with, the administrators and big organization can not achieve the betterment of the

territory

due to the fact that they are far from the surroundings.

This

is because the people have the direct contact to the

habitat

, which can better their home. Take

for instance

, my community leaders tend to construct a new road, they contacted public officials and large organisations, but they turn a deft hear to the

complain

Suggestion

complaint

complainant

, which lead the people to upgrade the road by themselves.

Hence

, the surroundings can only be upgraded by the people. Another point to consider is that both the public officers and the large enterprise have less

time

to affect positively on the

territory

. In fact, they are busy to concentrate on it, but the people alone have the

time

to boost it. Take

for example

, the

time

spent on gathering documents funds can not be compared but the citizen has enough chances to upgrade

territory

when they are ready to effect it.

As a result

of

this

, projects are being delayed. In conclusion, people would not achieve the improvement of their home,

however

public officers and reputable organizations alone can boost the

habitat

. I disagree with

this

statement because only the citizens are close and have the

time

to resolve and better their

habitat

.