Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

A section of society has been observed to consume only vegetarian

food

because they believe it to be good for the body and the earth. In my opinion, it is a personal choice to eat a vegetarian

diet

;

however

, a person cannot stay healthy or save the planet by restricting the

non-vegetarian

diet

To begin

with, the foremost reason that proves the

non-vegetarian

food

healthy is the availability of certain essential nutrients which are present only in animal meat or seafood.

Additionally

, there should be a variety of

food

, so that the body gets all the essential elements to stay fit and healthy.

For example

, if a person just relies on

plants

Accept comma addition

plants, then

then

he would become deficient in vitamin B, which can be obtained only from animals.

Similarly

, the

sea-

edible fish (broadly including freshwater fish) or shellfish or roe etc

seafood

food

provides Omega-3 which is present only in fish.

Thus

food

derived from animals is equally important for maintaining good health. Another reason for not restricting the

non-vegetarian

food

is it balances the ecosystem. Admittedly, if animals like goats and sheep are not consumed by

mankind

Accept comma addition

mankind, then

then

it may happen that their number grows drastically and may create a problem in the environment.

As a result

, it is proper to consume

non-vegetarian

food

along with vegetarian meals, which will keep their numbers in check. In conclusion, I pen

down saying

Accept comma addition

down, saying

that one should have a variety of

food

types in

diet

Suggestion

the diet

and should not restrict himself to just vegetarian

food

. The

food

from land and sea animals certainly is beneficial to overall health and eating just fruits and plants would make the body weak and deficient in essential vitamins.

Moreover

, the

food

chain and ecosystem can

also

be managed effectively if we include meat and fish in our

diet

Submitted by shamimpatelin on Fri Mar 29 2019

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction

Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence

Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

6.00

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0

Structure your answers in logical paragraphs

Include an introduction and conclusion

Support main points with an explanation and then an example

Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately

Vary your linking phrases using synonyms

Lexical resource: 5.0

Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms

Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes

Grammatical Range: 5.0

Use a variety of complex and simple sentences

Check your writing for errors

Task Achievement: 6.5

Answer all parts of the question

6.5

Present and fully explain ideas

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Word count

Become Premium

Check as many essays as you want
Analyze highlighted mistakes
Use the built-in grammar checker
Discover your weaknesses
Get suggestions to get a higher score
Browse the history of checked essays
14-day money back guarantee

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

6
band
In many countries, the proportion of old people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on society?
It is undoubtedly that the accelerating rate of the elderly people has ushered in some pressing concerns of society as a whole. While it would certainly be easy to garner either benefits or drawbacks of this increasing, I believe that the whole development brings more negative impacts.
7
band
Today, advanced science and technology have made great changes to people’s life, but artist such as musicians, painters and writers are still highly valued. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
As the state-of-the-art technology and science have converted humans to a more convenient lifestyle. Nonetheless, modern people still view art as a highly valued realm throughout the entire society. It is necessary to look at the inherent details on both sides to tell the difference between art and science.
4.5
band
Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that rich nations should allow higher numbers of refugees and provide them with adequate humanitarian aid. This essay agrees with this statement because richer nations have ample resources and infrastructure to support this cause.
7.5
band
More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In the modern workplace, many workers are being given the option to undertake their job from home, thus leading to the managing of one's own time. In my opinion, I believe that this is a positive development. Firstly, this essay will discuss, how being able to work away from the confines of an office can bring positive elements into a worker's life. Secondly, it will discuss the positive impact this may have on a person when no longer involved in the day to day activities happening in the office environment.
6
band
In today’s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualification. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this question?
Nowadays, getting a job is quite competitive. While some believe that companies require employees who have enough practical knowledge and in near future, there would no demand for formal qualification, I think diploma is vitally important in some jobs.

Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Fully explain your ideas

In many countries, the proportion of old people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on society?

Today, advanced science and technology have made great changes to people’s life, but artist such as musicians, painters and writers are still highly valued. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?

Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

In today’s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualification. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this question?