IELTS Writing Correction Service /
Check essay /
Search

IELTS Writing Samples by topic

Get a band score and detailed report instantly. Check your IELTS essays right now!
6
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a school of thought that learning local traditions is more essential than world history for school pupils. Nevertheless, I am in favor of the idea that it is equally important for them to study local, national and global history.
<4
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I agree, to the point of kids learning the local history first, rather than international. There may be many factors for the reason, but few of them are discussed in the latter part of the story.
4.5
band

it is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Studying history is indeed a must for young learners to gain fundamental knowledge of the world. While I agree that local history is important for school children, I also believe that learning about the past of the world is extremely necessary.
4.5
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

History is the study of the past.
6
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A common discussion among educators is about whether local history is more crucial than world history, with conflicting views on how school children would approach this issue. One opinion states that historical knowledge of the world will help prepare students for the globalized era that we are in today.
5.5
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

History is an important subject at school. Some people prompt the ideal that local history plays a more important role compared to world history. In my opinion, I partially disagree with this.
5.5
band

It is important for school children to learn about local history rather than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many individuals are much curious about the history and the usfeful information could be learnd from stuyding it. It is thought that children should know about only local history at school not the world one. In my opinion, educational system should provide both matterials in its curiculumn.
5
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent to you agree or disagree?

Many people have valued the role of local history to schoolchildren over that of world history. In my opinion, I disagree with those people as both of them are equally essential for young learners. Studying the history of their hometown is for sure an indispensable part of school’s curriculum during students’ early education. I believe having thorough insights into what happened in the past at one’s locality develops his patriotism. For example, children of primary and secondary schools in my village are taught about how their ancestors defended their land against outside intruders and reclaimed sovereignty. Therefore, those young children would take pride in their origin and treasure the life they have today. Additionally, I think it is not only students’ privilege but also their responsibility to know about their own history to understand their hometown’s traditional values and identity. From another angle, learning about world history shares equal importance just as local one. Acquiring knowledge about the world’s past events equips students with a more well-rounded perspective of life. Lessons about the World War or Feminism protest against women’s abuse and discrimination would help those learners enhance their understanding about various aspects of the world. Furthermore, I think that being taught about the other countries’ historical backgrounds would benefit young learners in their future career. Students who accumulate knowledge of this particular field at an early age would possess a golden selling point to work for foreign enterprises, especially those who highly value company culture like Japan. In conclusion, I believe the significance of domestic and international history cannot be brought into comparison to see which one is more necessary because they have distinctively equal meanings to children.
7.5
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent to you agree or disagree?

The modern schooling systems always aiming to impart a good quality education for the students. However, in the process of providing a quality education they fail to focus on the local history, so In my opinion, it's always more important to focus on the local history than world history.
5.5
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, in schools, children are exposed to various matters of historical topics from all around the world which are prepared based on curriculum. Students can learn about their home town’s historical aspects or history of foreign countries. Personally, I hold the perception that learning local history by students has a numerous advantages including getting familiar with reasons of traditions and surviving home towns history.
6
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, there exists a debatable question of whether studying the history of pupils’ own country or studying the history of the world is more important, has aroused people’s curiosity. Although acquiring knowledge of world history is of necessity, the national or local history should be on schools high agenda.
7.5
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent to you agree or disagree?

It is suggested that young students ought to know about the history of their own rather than concentrating on the global history. In my opinion, I agree with this suggestion and believe that it helps a child to develop a better understanding regarding his lineage and foster patriotism.
6.5
band

it is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history . to what extent do you agree or disagree ?

It is often argued that global history is more crucial to know as compared to that of their own. In my opinion,I completely agree with this perspective as it widens the horizon of knowledge among schoolchildren.
7.5
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Learning history is an important part of the school curriculum. It is debated that learning the history of one's own region is more important than the knowledge of world history. This essay does not agree with the suggestion that local history is more important. This essay will initially discuss how learning international history extends a student's knowledge beyond his country and increases his opinion about world politics.
7
band

It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It’s argued that children should study the history of their country/region rather than the history of the world. While I agree that learning about regional history is important, I don’t agree that world history is less important.
6
band

It’s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree？

It is suggested that school children should learn more about their local history instead of world history. I tend not to agree with this view.
5
band

It’s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that learning at school about local traditions should be preferred to lecturing about world history. Although I agree that educating children to study what occurred to the human beings in general, I think that the school, as public enti
7
band

It’s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree？

History is an essential subject for students these days, as it offers children the chance to know the background and development of humans. Since there is a wide range of history to learn, some people believe that children should focus on their country's
8
band

It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

History can assist people to learn about the lifestyle, culture, and tradition of an ancient civilization. It is often believed that acquiring knowledge about native history is crucial than learning about global history. Despite having direct influences of local history on inhabitants, I believe that folks ought to learn about the history of the world in order to know the world civilization and information of ancient people in different places.
8
band

It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, more and more experts advocate that studying their traditional history in the school outweighs learning the history worldwide. Although globalization leads foreign culture study to be prevalent, I agree that pupils should learn about their ancestors’ stories rather than foreigners' ones.
Become Premium
  • Check as many essays as you want
  • Analyze highlighted mistakes
  • Use the built-in grammar checker
  • Discover your weaknesses
  • Get suggestions to get a higher score
  • Browse the history of checked essays
  • 14-day money back guarantee