IELTS Writing Samples by topic

Get a band score and detailed report instantly. Check your IELTS essays right now!
A few people think that all monuments built during ancient times must be replaced with new structures by the government. I strongly disagree to this fact since our government will not be able to recreate them and these buildings make learning history easier for our children.
Generally speaking, it has been argued by a number of people that monumental structures be demolished to give way to the construction of new ones. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this argument as I see preserving famous structures as being an evidence of our cultural heritage and also a means of revenue to the government.
Historic structures reflect the brilliant work done by our ancestral generations. It's an evidence of their existence and immense human architectural capacity. In the recent times, there have been debates around this where some people mention that the Government should collapse all the ancestral buildings and replace them with a modern city plan. This essay will discuss why the classic creations should be kept intact with the other modern buildings around the city and native towns.
Some contemporary style lovers debate about tearing down the old heritage monuments versus the people who support preserving the old structures. My opinion coincides with the latter community, because protecting the aboriginals strengthen the roots of the nation and promote tourism as well.
Historic buildings are symbols of every nations history. I keep totally an opposite plan toward any idea advocating destroying these buildings.
It is an undeniable fact that historic buildings are the greatest asset for a country or a city. It is quite surprising that some people want to break them down and replace with modern buildings. I totally disagree with them because historic sites always exhibit our old civilization, generate money, and helpful to learn the great glory of our ancestors .
It is an undeniable fact that historic buildings are the greatest asset for a country or a city. Although, some people want to break them down and replace them with modern buildings. I totally disagree with them because historic sites always exhibit our old civilization, generate money, and helpful to learn the great glory of our ancestors .
Historic buildings and monuments are one of the most valuable treasure of any country. However, there are some people who believe that the authority should demolish these buildings in order to construct new ones. I strongly disagree with this statement because these constructions not only do educate us regarding our history and culture, but attract tourists as well. This essay will support my points in the following paragraphs.
It is undeniable fact that every country’s monuments and historic sites are their heritage. Surprisingly, there are some who feel it less valued and want the government to pull it down. In my opinion, these are the greatest assets of every country and deserve respectful attitudes by citizens.
The bar chart compares the percentage of different five Australia's cities, namely Sydney, Melbourme, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart, in terms of consuming habits of coffee and tea. Overall, A similar trend can be seen in these four cities, without Adelaide, while each kinds of sector has specific trends.
Historical places and buildings are the country's heritage and no one can deny that they role an important part in every country's history. Some people believe that government need to change these buildings to more developed and modern ones. In my point o
Nowadays, most of the historic buildings are being replaced with modern buildings due to a plethora of reasons. I tend to disagree with this statement and elaborate more detail in the upcoming paragraphs.
Recently, some argue that authorities should demolish all the historical buildings and rebuild modern buildings to replace them. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this statement.
historical monuments allow us to peek inside ancient times. many folks argue that authorities should demolish ancient buildings and construct buildings according to the modern era. however , I disagree with the notion owing to the fact that these building
Modern technology has changed a lot in many years especially in last decade, which may change how people will alter the way how they get latest news. Some people think that, it will replace completely traditional Newspapers and Magazines because of the development of advanced tools such as internet, mobiles and computers etc. This essay will clear why traditional newspapers are still have same importance as old days in 19th century.
There has been a continuous debate on demolishing old buildings, in order to construct the new ones. Industrialized community believes that constructing modern structures is the major source to boost economy, whereas history lovers consider the monument an important tool for tourism. In my opinion, these historic places represent our culture and should be preserved.
Every country has been belong to some historic value and culture. Historic building told every part of the history. The Government plays an important role to maintain and defend the ancient part of their society. While some people feels that these buildings should be break down by the Government to make a new modern structures. I oppose with the provided statement.
The given line graph dileanetes the information about the total figure of the residents who deployed the three major railway systems to travel within the United nation between 1950 to 2004/05 and the units are measured in millions.
Become Premium
  • Check as many essays as you want
  • Analyze highlighted mistakes
  • Use the built-in grammar checker
  • Discover your weaknesses
  • Get suggestions to get a higher score
  • Browse the history of checked essays
  • 14-day money back guarantee